Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

OpenAI loses trademark dispute at EU court

▲ 264 points 167 comments by hermanzegerman 2mo ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this document is fully human-written

1 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 223
PEAK AI % 1% · §1
Analyzed
Jul 15
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 223 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 223 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 1%

15.07.2026, 14:24 Uhr OpenAI, the US company behind ChatGPT, has lost its legal challenge against the refusal to register the trademark "OPENAI" at the European Union's General Court.The Luxembourg-based court ruled that, for certain software and information technology goods and services, the term is purely descriptive and therefore lacks the distinctiveness required for trademark protection. The ruling can still be appealed to the European Court of Justice.The court's judgment upheld a decision by the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). The office had partially rejected OpenAI's application for trademark registration, for example in relation to software and cloud computing services.The EUIPO found that the word "open" would be understood by the relevant public as meaning freely accessible, while the combination with "AI" (artificial intelligence) would be interpreted as referring to products based on openly accessible artificial intelligence.OpenAI had argued that the word "open" has multiple possible meanings and that "OPENAI" is a coined term without a fixed meaning. The company also cited comparable trademark registrations previously granted by the EUIPO and registrations in more than 30 other countries, including the United Kingdom and Singapore.The court rejected these arguments. It ruled that the combination of words was not an unusual linguistic combination in English. Furthermore, registrations in other jurisdictions were not binding under EU trademark law. Court ruling (c) 2026 dpa Deutsche Presse Agentur GmbH