Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

Recursive Self-Improvement via AI for Chip Design & Chip Design for AI - Ricursive Intelligence

▲ 317 points • 113 comments • by Philpax • 20h ago • HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this entire text is human-written.

0 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 116
PEAK AI % 0% · §1
Analyzed
Nov 4
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 116 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 116 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%

Rather than investing in a brute-force RL climb, we carefully iterated on our SFT and RL recipes with a focus on compute efficiency. We opted not to buy any posttraining data, instead devising our own synthetic data pipelines, quality filtering, and coverage metrics. Our mixed RL recipe uses truncated importance sampling, score centering, and linear length penalty with high-quality long-horizon synthetic environments. The RL tasks are tuned for our model capabilities, and we continuously added harder tasks as the model improved.The end result was a steep RL climb from a strong initial SFT checkpoint. We reached a TerminalBench 2.1 score of 80.5 with only 1.4M rollouts, roughly 70x fewer rollouts than Reflection Beam, the prior SOTA.